Our Resources

Tokenisation is moving beyond experimentation. In Malaysia, that shift became tangible this year with its first tokenised sukuk priced at a nominal value of RM100 million. The pilot brought together banks and institutional investors to test how distributed ledger technology could operate within an established capital-market framework.Real-world assets, or RWAs, are digital representations of existing financial or physical assets such as government securities, commodities, equities, funds and credit. Using blockchain technology, tokenisation creates a digital record of an instrument that already exists. The underlying asset, such as real estate or solar farms, and the legal and commercial arrangements around it, continue to exist off-chain.Blockchain is being tested here as infrastructure for assets and markets that investors already understand. That is a narrower claim than the one usually made for it, and a more durable one. The useful question is no longer whether RWAs can be tokenised, but where tokenisation is gaining traction and what still needs to be in place for adoption to scale.Looking Beyond the Headline GrowthAccording to CoinGecko’s 2026 RWA Report, the market capitalisation of tokenised RWAs increased from US$5.42 billion at the start of 2025 to US$19.32 billion as at 31 March 2026, an increase of 256%. Stablecoins, which CoinGecko tracks separately, stood at US$301.65 billion.Growth has been concentrated. The breakdown below shows where it sits.

RWA categoryMarket value, 31 Mar 2026Leading project or assetPrimary driverFiat stablecoinsUS$301.65bnUSDT, USDCOn-chain liquidityTokenised TreasuriesUS$12.99bnCircle USYC, BlackRock BUIDLInstitutional yieldCommodity tokensUS$5.55bnTether Gold XAUT, PAX Gold PAXGGold price rallyPrivate creditUS$2.29bnMaple Finance (US$2.13bn active loans)Institutional crypto lendingTokenised stocksUS$0.49bnCircle, Tesla, Nvidia, SpaceXRegulatory clarityTokenised ETFsUS$0.30bnOndo SPDR S&P 500, iShares Silver Trust (Ondo)On-chain TradFi access

Source: CoinGecko Research, 2026 RWA Report, data as at 31 March 2026. Private credit data sourced by CoinGecko from DefiLlama. Stablecoins and private credit are tracked separately from the US$19.32 billion tokenised RWA total and are not additive to it.Treasuries and commodities together made up a significant proportion of growth in market value in tokenised RWAs, with gold-backed products driving most of the commodities figure.That concentration is instructive of growing institutional acceptance. Government debt and gold reached scale first, and both have established pricing, familiar financial characteristics and deep existing markets. That is a more mundane explanation than novelty, and a more useful one.The institutions moving first reflect the same pattern. BlackRock, Franklin Templeton and JP Morgan have each brought money market and Treasury products on-chain, applying the technology to instruments they already issue and manage. Tokenisation is gaining traction where the underlying economics are already clear, which points to a distinction that matters: its near-term value lies less in creating new asset classes than in improving how established ones are issued, distributed, transferred or settled. What the Technology Changes, and What It Does NotTokenisation is often associated with greater access, transparency, efficiency and liquidity. Each is possible. None is automatic.Fractionalisation divides an asset into smaller investment units, lowering minimum ticket sizes and broadening participation. But actual investor access still depends on securities laws, investor eligibility, distribution channels and the jurisdiction in which the product is offered. Blockchain creates an auditable record of on-chain transactions, but it cannot prove on its own that an underlying asset exists, is valued correctly or is free from competing claims. Those assurances depend on legal structure, custody, independent verification and governance.Liquidity provides the clearest example. A token makes an asset technically easier to transfer, but finding a buyer is a separate problem. CoinGecko found that although tokenised equities have grown rapidly, monthly trading volumes remain a small fraction of real-world stock market volumes. A more tradable wrapper does not automatically make an illiquid market liquid.The technology can change the rails. The economics of the underlying market still matter.  From Experimentation to Institutional InfrastructureNone of this diminishes the potential of RWAs, but it does set out what institutional adoption requires. To move beyond individual pilots, tokenised assets need technology that interacts with regulated custody, enforceable ownership rights, credible valuation and disclosure, cybersecurity, investor protection and existing financial infrastructure.Different token structures also confer different rights. CoinGecko’s review of major tokenised equity issuers found three approaches in use. Some products are structured notes backed by securities held through regulated intermediaries. Others use segregated custody arrangements. In a few cases, the token itself is the legally registered share. The difference determines what an investor owns, who stands behind that claim and which legal and regulatory protections apply. Malaysia is Beginning to Test the BridgeMalaysia is an interesting setting for this transition because experimentation is taking place at different layers. At one end are early-stage builders working on applications such as energy infrastructure and data verification. At the institutional end sits the tokenised sukuk pilot undertaken by Khazanah Nasional in collaboration with the Securities Commission (SC).The pilot is relevant because it works inside the existing financial system rather than around it. The joint media release describes it as a test of institutional readiness, executed under the SC’s pilot programme so that emerging technologies remain consistent with market integrity and investor protection. It gives the market a template that lowers technical and regulatory barriers for future issuers and is aligned with the direction set under the Capital Market Masterplan 2026-2030.Malaysia’s wider policy environment is also evolving. The upcoming National Blockchain Policy, led by the Ministry of Digital, will provide clearer national direction for blockchain and Web3, covering governance, infrastructure, talent, funding and research and development.Taken together, these point to a more useful national question than whether Malaysia should participate in blockchain. It is whether Malaysia can build the technical, regulatory, commercial and investment capabilities around it strongly enough to capture meaningful value. What This Means for Venture CapitalFor venture capital, the opportunity around RWA extends beyond the tokenised assets themselves. As financial infrastructure becomes programmable, companies are emerging around the layers that make it work, from verification and custody through to compliance, settlement and interoperability.These businesses illustrate why frontier categories demand a wider set of investment capabilities. Software evaluation is only part of it. A tokenised credit business requires an understanding of the credit being originated. A custody business must be assessed through both technology and regulatory lenses.There is also a question of where economic value ultimately accrues. Over the fifteen months covered by its report, CoinGecko found that six of the seven leading RWA project tokens it tracks, excluding stablecoin issuer tokens, recorded significant negative price returns even as the sector expanded. It notes that on-chain value creation does not necessarily translate into value accruing to token holders. Market growth and investment returns are not the same thing.Jelawang Capital commits capital to venture capital fund managers who assess opportunities and make their own investment decisions. Manager capability is therefore the variable that matters. Categories at the intersection of technology and regulated markets require expertise across technology, legal structure, regulation, counterparties and the economics of the underlying asset. The question is less about exposure to RWAs as a theme than about whether managers can assess where durable value is built.Adoption is progressing fastest where the underlying asset is already trusted and understood. The harder work is building the infrastructure, governance and institutional confidence that lets tokenisation travel further.Advancing Malaysia depends on more than being present where the next generation of financial infrastructure is built. It depends on Malaysian firms, managers and institutions capturing more of the value created along the way. Jelawang Capital supports the development of fund managers with the capability to evaluate and back frontier categories as they mature in Malaysia’s venture ecosystem.

For decades, Malaysia’s economic success story was built on its ability to attract investment, create jobs and become a trusted manufacturing hub for the world. Factories were built, exports surged and the country emerged as one of Asia’s rising economies. Yet today, Malaysia faces a new challenge: how to capture more of the value it helps create. Embarking on this journey requires considerable time and resources, but it is crucial if the country is to advance from merely hosting value to actually owning it. To understand this challenge, it helps to examine two powerful concepts discussed by Khazanah Nasional’s Chief Investment Officer and Jelawang Capital Chairman, Datuk Hisham Hamdan: the “hotel economy” and the “smile curve” in the 2025 Khazanah Report. Together, these concepts explain why Malaysia must move beyond simply hosting economic activity and instead build greater ownership, innovation and technological capability. They also illustrate why initiatives to elevate the venture capital ecosystem undertaken by Jelawang Capital are important to strengthening Malaysia’s long-term economic future. Understanding the Hotel EconomyImagine a luxury hotel bustling with activity. Business leaders gather in meeting rooms, investors negotiate major deals in the lounge and entrepreneurs strike partnerships over coffee. The hotel serves as the venue, while providing services that make these interactions possible.However, while billion-ringgit agreements may be concluded inside the hotel, the hotel itself captures only a small fraction of the value generated. Most of the profits, ownership and strategic benefits belong to the parties doing business there. This is the essence of the “hotel economy.”For many years, Malaysia has successfully acted as a host for global manufacturing and multinational investment, as evidenced by our success as a regional backend hub for semiconductor packaging. Foreign companies have set up factories, employed Malaysian workers and exported products worldwide. While this creates jobs and economic activity, the highest-value elements such as intellectual property, product design, research and strategic decision-making often remain in the hands of overseas headquarters. Malaysia benefited from economic activity but ultimately captured only part of the total value created. This raises two questions: how much of this value does Malaysia truly keep, and how can we capture more?The challenge is not to stop attracting foreign investment, but to ensure that more ownership, expertise and long-term value remain within the country. The Smile Curve, ExplainedA second concept to understand where Malaysia is positioned as an economy is through the “smile curve.”Imagine a curved smile or a ‘U’ pattern. At both ends of the smile are activities that generate high value and high profits. On one side are research, innovation, intellectual property creation and technological advances. On the other side are assembly, distribution and after-sales services. At the bottom of the curve sits manufacturing and assembly work. While these activities are essential, they often generate thinner margins because they can be replicated more easily and compete mainly on cost. Malaysia’s position among the Smile Curve (2000 vs. 2019) from Marcopolo.org analysisMalaysia’s industrial growth has historically been concentrated near the bottom of this curve and saw marginal gains over the past two decades. On the other hand, the country developed the necessary expertise and became highly competitive in manufacturing, supported by strong infrastructure, industrial parks and skilled workers. This model fuelled decades of growth and helped transform Malaysia into a major export economy. But the global landscape has shifted. Lower-cost countries such as Vietnam and Thailand now compete aggressively for manufacturing investment, making it harder for Malaysia to rely solely on assembly and production. The country needs to move up the value chain to avoid becoming stuck in the middle. In other words, it needs to move up to higher-value ends of the smile curve.According to the article, Malaysia is caught between being too costly to compete purely on labour and not yet positioned strongly enough at the high-value ends of the curve. Why Ownership MattersThe difference between hosting value and owning value is crucial.A country may manufacture a sophisticated product, yet the largest profits often flow to whoever owns the patents, controls the technology or manages the global brand. A semiconductor component can be assembled in one country, but the economic benefits may largely accrue elsewhere if the design, software and intellectual property are owned overseas.That is why economic development today is increasingly about creation and ownership of ideas. Technology and innovation take precedence over merely participating in production.Datuk Hisham uses another analogy from economist Ricardo Hausmann: economic development is like a game of Scrabble. Infrastructure, roads and factories are the “vowels” that every economy needs. However, it is the rarer “consonants” such as deep technical knowhow, advanced research capabilities, entrepreneurial talent and intellectual property that enable countries to form more valuable combinations and compete at the highest levels. Malaysia already possesses many of the foundational vowels. The next stage is acquiring more of these high-value consonants. Why Startups and Venture Capital MatterThis is where venture capital becomes critical.Many of the world’s most valuable companies began as startups pursuing new technologies, business models and products. Venture capital provides the risk-tolerant funding that allows these young companies to experiment, innovate and scale before profitability is achieved.But this kind of funding is, by design, difficult to provide well. Backing a company before its technology, its market, or its team has been proven is a different kind of work than financing something already established. Banks need predictable repayment. Public markets need quarterly results. Very few institutions are structured to wait years for an outcome that isn't guaranteed.Of every ten companies a fund manager backs, most will not return the capital invested in them. The few that do carry the rest. That is not a flaw in how venture capital works. It is how venture capital works, and it is precisely why doing it well requires real discipline, not less of it. A strong venture capital ecosystem does more than create successful businesses. It develops founders, attracts talent, generates intellectual property, creates high-value jobs and builds entire innovation ecosystems. In practical terms, it helps countries move toward the high-value ends of the smile curve. Cultivating promising startups requires a long-term commitment. Building homegrown champions capable of competing globally is a direct result of truly catalytic capital. What This Means for MalaysiaJelawang Capital's current mandate extends this same approach across sectors and geographies, ensuring that high calibre startups receive the support they deserve. SkyeChip Bhd received early stage venture capital backing by Ilham Capital and LionX Ventures, two fund managers supported by Jelawang Capital. Aonic, a Malaysian dronetech startup backed by Kairous Capital, now operates across 15 countries, holds major contracts with Malaysian plantation groups, and is profitable.Granite Asia-backed Galatek Technologies, a semiconductor equipment and vision-AI company, is now expanding its manufacturing footprint in Penang with a sizeable investment commitment of $100 million.Neither SkyeChip nor Aonic looked inevitable in the beginning. That is what foundational investing actually requires: backing a specific team, at a specific stage, well before the market, or the outcome, is settled.Jelawang Capital’s RoleAs Malaysia’s National Fund-of-Funds and part of Khazanah’s Dana Impak, Jelawang Capital seeks to strengthen Malaysia’s venture capital ecosystem through initiatives such as the Emerging Fund Managers’ Programme (EMP) and the Regional Fund Managers’ Initiative (RMI). To date, approximately RM300 million has been mobilised, alongside RM30 million crowded in from external co-investors for fund managers under the EMP.Jelawang Capital does not invest in startups directly. It backs credible, disciplined fund managers who make these calls, long before the outcome is clear, so that companies like these can get the early support that lets them build. Venture capital isn’t just about patient capital, but also disciplined fund selection, strong governance, rigorous due diligence and active portfolio oversight.Malaysia's next chapter of development will not be written simply by attracting more economic activity. Success will depend on whether the country can own more of the value generated from that activity.The hotel economy reminds us that hosting value is not the same as capturing it. The smile curve shows that the greatest rewards increasingly belong to those who innovate, design, build brands and own intellectual property. It is slow, often invisible work. Some companies may not succeed, but others will go on to change how an entire industry operates, and in doing so, help Malaysia own a little more of what it builds, rather than simply hosting it.As Datuk Hisham put it in his essay: "Not every effort will reach maturity. But that is not failure. It is the price of building something authentic." 

Malaysia’s first great economic ascent emerged from a profound reordering of the global economy. Following the Plaza Accord of 1985, the sharp appreciation of the Japanese yen pushed manufacturing capital and industrial production across Asia in search of more competitive destinations. Malaysia was among the countries best positioned to benefit. We welcomed foreign direct investment, developed industrial zones, strengthened export capabilities, and embedded ourselves into global supply chains just as multinational firms were restructuring their operations across the region. The result was Malaysia’s “Tiger Cub Economy” era. Between 1988 and 1996, the country sustained average annual GDP growth exceeding 8%, driven by rapid industrialisation, surging exports and expanding employment.However, China’s accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 exposed the limits of this model. As global manufacturing capacity consolidated around China’s scale, infrastructure and supplier networks, Malaysia’s position as a host for production became harder to defend on cost alone. Hosting activity was no longer sufficient. Malaysia needed to retain more value by building local firms, technical know-how, intellectual property and ownership in the industries where we participate.The very model that powered our rise also shaped our limitations. Malaysia became highly effective at attracting and hosting global production, but less successful at retaining the higher-value layers of innovation, intellectual property and technological ownership that ultimately determine long-term economic prosperity.For a country to grow, it must attract activity. For a country to prosper, it must own more of the value created from that activity. While we have become adept at making things, the harder question today is how much value Malaysia actually retains. What are we giving away when we celebrate headline investment numbers? How much of the intellectual property, capital returns, strategic decision-making and future optionality remain here? And to what extent is this holding back our full potential?The cost of prioritising headline investment volume over actual value retention is visible in our long-term developmental trajectory. Creating value and capturing value are not the same thing. While economic activity may take place within a country's borders, measures such as Gross National Income (GNI) per capita ultimately reveal how much of that value remains and accrues to its people.By absorbing foreign assembly functions more successfully than we scaled homegrown intellectual property, Malaysia became anchored in the middle-income trap. While Malaysia’s GNI per capita of USD11,650 as of 2024 remains below the World Bank’s high-income status threshold of USD13,935, South Korea has climbed to roughly three times Malaysia’s level at a GNI per capita of USD36,750. International benchmarks tell a similar story where South Korea represents ~26% of MSCI Asia ex Japan index weight, relative to ~1% for Malaysia.The divergence reflects a deeper challenge in Malaysia's productive capabilities. According to the Harvard Growth Lab's Atlas of Economic Complexity, developed by Professor Ricardo Hausmann and Professor César A. Hidalgo, Malaysia ranks 32nd globally on the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), two places lower than a decade ago. Over the same period, countries such as Romania (23rd, ↑ 9 ranks), Lithuania (29th, ↑6 ranks) and Croatia (30th, ↑7 ranks) steadily improved their productive capabilities and overtook Malaysia in the rankings over the last decade, while Vietnam (45th, ↑17 ranks) continued to make notable gains. Although Malaysia maintains a relatively sophisticated export base, it has not expanded the diversity and complexity of its productive capabilities as rapidly as many of its peers. South Korea, by comparison,ranks 4th globally.The premise is simple. A factory can export without creating ownership. A supply chain can employ Malaysian engineers while the intellectual property sits elsewhere. A multinational company can operate here while strategic decisions, capital returns and the highest-value functions remain at headquarters abroad. In that model, Malaysia benefits, but only partially. We provide the labour, the infrastructure and the stability, but too much of the real value leaks out to other countries, companies and stock exchanges.This bears resemblance to the "hotel economy” concept, where a hotel can be bustling and important to the activity within it, yet the most valuable conversations and decisions in the lobby lounge do not belong to the hotel. A billion-ringgit deal can be struck there, but the hotel captures only the relatively nominal value of providing the venue and services.The solution is not to close the hotel. Foreign investment and global supply chains remain essential. But Malaysia must participate more meaningfully in the value being created, not merely provide the location where it happens. We must use the presence of global capital and multinational companies to build deeper Malaysian capability, stronger local firms, greater technical know-how and more domestic capital ownership in the sectors that will define the future.Building the Letters of a More Complex EconomyThis work is inherently difficult. Building the kind of economy that owns, rather than merely hosts, is not a simple undertaking. Development economist Professor Ricardo Hausmann defines economic complexity as the know-how embedded in firms, industries and people that allows a country to produce sophisticated goods and services.Think of economic development like a game of Scrabble. Every player starts with the same board, but the points you score depend on the letters you hold. Vowels are essential because without them, no word gets formed. However, they carry the lowest point value in the game. It is the consonants, the rarer and harder-to-acquire letters, that determine whether you score modestly or dominate the board. The consonants allow a player to form complex high-value words & sentences to dominate the board.For economies, the same principle holds. High-income jobs are created when a country is able to combine higher value alphabets to elevate its economic complexity by producing what few others can. We become price takers if we sell commoditised and undifferentiated products such as palm oil or semiconductor assembly and testing services. We become price setters if we build capabilities that are difficult to replicate, such as advanced chip design and specialised pharmaceutical development.Malaysia’s development story can be read through this lens. We, like many other countries, already possess many of the “vowels” of development: roads, ports, industrial zones, connectivity, and basic manufacturing capacity built over decades of investment. These are essential foundations. But in the language of global value chains, they often anchor us near the base of the economic Smile Curve: the high-volume, lower-margin territory of physical processing and contract assembly, that positions us as price takers and ultimately limits how far household incomes and wages can rise.Positions along the Smile Curve (2000 vs. 2019)Malaysia has long occupied this base of the Smile Curve. For decades, that position served us well. We attracted FDI, built industries and achieved growth by offering what multinational supply chains needed: reliable production at competitive cost.That proposition is now under structural pressure. Across the region, lower-cost economies, including Vietnam and Thailand, have emerged as credible alternatives, eroding the labour-cost differential that once underpinned our model. Competing with Vietnam & Thailand on cost alone is a race to the bottom, a race that Malaysia will lose. Malaysia is caught between two positions: no longer cheap enough to compete comfortably at the base, but not yet sufficiently equipped to command the high-value ends of the curve. Essentially, Malaysia remains “stuck in the middle” as per Professor Richard Vietor from Harvard Business School.The base of the curve is no longer a place Malaysia can afford to stay. We must climb. We now require the “consonants”: know-how, technology, domestic capability and firms capable of competing beyond our borders.Some of these consonants already exist within Malaysia, but they reside largely within multinational firms. The know-how is here, the technology is here, but the ownership and diffusion into local hands remains shallow. These consonants represent the ascending, high-value sections of the curve: upstream research and proprietary intellectual property on one end, and downstream branding, distribution and market access on the other.If we fail to build these consonants, we remain confined to the bottom of the Smile Curve, providing the location where value is created while the true wealth of industry continues to be captured elsewhere. Again, creating value does not necessarily mean capturing it. A country may manufacture the product, employ the workforce and facilitate the transaction, yet the largest share of economic value often accrues to those who own the intellectual property, control the technology, shape the brand and direct the flow of capital.This is Khazanah’s role as a purpose-driven investor. We are not merely an investor in the narrow sense of purchasing assets for returns. We are an institution designed to act where national value can be built, particularly where the market moves too slowly, too cautiously or too narrowly.Our historical blueprint reflects this mandate. Khazanah helped consolidate a fragmented domestic healthcare landscape and supported the creation of what became a global champion in IHH Healthcare. We also anchored large-scale regional economic development through investments such as Iskandar Malaysia in Johor, at a time when private capital deemed the developmental risk too high. This requires more discipline, not less.We must operate in spaces where markets are still forming, risks are difficult to price and ecosystems are fragmented. Returns may be non-linear. They may not always flow directly back to the initial investor. They may appear instead as supplier depth, tax revenue, technical knowledge, better jobs, stronger firms and deeper local ownership.This is what I sometimes call “foundational investing”: investing when the ecosystem is still young, before the market has fully formed, and before success is obvious. It is not undisciplined investing. In fact, it requires greater discipline because the path is uncertain and the impact may compound across the ecosystem rather than appear immediately on a single balance sheet.Not every effort will reach maturity. But that is not failure. It is theprice of building something authentic.South Korea's experience reminds us that countries which climb the development ladder often make deliberate choices before the payoff is visible. They build institutions, back capability formation and take risks long before the market sends obvious signals. In doing so, they would have to accept periods of uncertainty, missteps and short-term sacrifice in exchange for greater long-term economic resilience and competitiveness. They understand that value appears not only as financial return, but also through industrial depth, technical capacity, local ownership and globally competitive firms. Dana Impak: Catalytic Capital for the DifficultDana Impak is Khazanah’s catalytic capital platform to support Malaysia’s next stage of economicdevelopment. Under the Ministry of Finance’s GEAR-uP initiative, Khazanah has committed RM6 billion to help advance Malaysia’s economic complexity by strengthening firms, building capabilities and catalysing strategic ecosystems. This is not capital deployed for sustainable financial returns alone. It is catalytic capital deployed with strategic intent, targeted at areas where market gaps remain and where funding, enterprise support, technical capability and ecosystem coordination need to come together.Through Dana Impak, Khazanah is helping Malaysia build the consonants of a more complexeconomy: stronger firms, deeper capabilities and new engines of growth that are harder to build,but necessary for the country’s next stage of development.Jelawang Capital: Catalysing the Malaysian venture capital and startup ecosystemAt the early stage of the company lifecycle, Malaysian startups require more than funding. They need institutional capital, capable fund managers, market access and regional networks to scale.Building a company is like raising a child: different stages of growth demand different kinds of parents. There is the Foundational Parent, who sets purpose and direction in the early years. The Skilled Parent, who instils discipline and builds capability as the child develops. The Innovation Parent, who brings exposure to new ideas and unlocks the next level of potential. And the Accountability Parent, who imposes the rigour that turns a good child into a great one.Capital works the same way. The Foundational Parent is patient, long-term institutional capital willing to back potential before it is proven. The Skilled Parent is represented by private equityand operational  partners who bring transformation playbooks and scale. The Innovation Parent is venture capital and technology networks that open access to frontier capabilities. The Accountability Parent is public markets, where performance is tested and rewarded. No single parent raises the child alone, and no single capital type builds a company to its full potential. Through Jelawang Capital, Khazanah supports Malaysia’s venture capital ecosystem via the Emerging Fund Managers Programme and the Regional Fund Managers Initiative. To date, around RM300 million of investments have been mobilised, with more than RM30 million crowded in from external co-investors for Emerging Fund Managers Programme managers. The companies emerging from this pipeline show how early-stage capital can support both commercial scale and domestic capability.Aonic is a Malaysian drone solutions company operating in 15 countries, serving plantation groups and improving rural productivity at scale. DF Automation was founded by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia alumni who turned university research into autonomous mobile robots deployed by manufacturers worldwide. ServAuto rebuilt Malaysia’s fragmented automotive aftersales market with a digital platform that served over 30,000 customers in its first year. These are not yet national champions in the old sense. But they represent something Malaysia needs more of firms that combine local problem-solving with technology, regional ambition and exportable capabilityTogether, these companies reflect the role of catalytic capital in helping Malaysian firms turn early promise into commercial scale, adding new letters to Malaysia’s economic vocabulary and expanding what the country is able to build.Mid-Tier Companies: Strengthening the Missing MiddleFurther along the growth trajectory, Dana Impak focuses on Malaysia’s “Missing Middle”.Mid-tier companies are an important part of the economy, contributing around 36% of national Gross Domestic Product and 16% of national employment. Yet many continue to face constraints in accessing the right form of growth capital, strengthening operational capabilities and preparing for larger-scale expansion.Khazanah addresses this through a dual-track approach, combining capacity development with growth capital through private equity and private credit strategies.The capital track supports value creation and provides alternative financing solutions, including non-dilutive capital. Capacity development efforts such as the Mid-Tier Company Growth Innovation Programme and ELEVATE, in partnership with the Securities Commission Malaysia, help mid-tier companies sharpen their growth strategy, improve investor readiness and boost productivity to unlock innovation-led growth.To date, more than 50 Malaysian mid-tier companies have been supported. NSW Automation, a precision fluid dispensing systems company serving the semiconductor industry, is commercialising high-precision technology for next-generation advanced packaging customers globally. Jalen, a Malaysian consumer brand known for its household kicap products, is applying the Working Backwards methodology through the Mid-Tier Company Growth Innovation Programme to identify new growth opportunities that better serve evolving consumer needs, with its concept currently under testing and validation. The missing middle matters because Malaysia cannot rely only on large incumbents or early-stage startups. We need more firms in the middle that are capable of scaling, professionalising, innovating and eventually competing beyond Malaysia.A core part of raising Malaysia’s economic complexity lies in moving beyond lower- value activities into higher-value capabilities such as integrated circuit design, advanced packaging, equipment and materials.Dana Impak supports this shift through targeted investments across the semiconductor and advanced manufacturing ecosystem. This includes anchor investments into specialised vehicles such as the ViTrox-backed Cambrian Fund, as well as direct and indirect exposure to companies building capabilities in integrated circuit design, advanced packaging and frontier technologies.SkyeChip shows how this targeted ecosystem approach can support companies across the lifecycle. From early venture support through Gobi Partners Dana Impak Ventures to Khazanah’s participation as a leading cornerstone investor alongside EPF, LTAT, Tabung Haji and other institutional capital providers, SkyeChip reflects the relay race of capital needed to support potential Malaysian champions.Its Main Market debut on Bursa Malaysia marks an important milestone for Malaysia’s semiconductor ambitions and the development of higher-value integrated circuit design capabilities. With more than 300 specialised integrated circuit design engineers and over 100 patents in artificial intelligence and high- performance computing, SkyeChip reflects Malaysia’s growing depth in semiconductor intellectual property.Dana Impak also supports companies that can anchor new technical depth in Malaysia.NanoSkunkWorkX, founded by Malaysian entrepreneurs including a NASA-trained scientist, is developing graphene-based platforms with potential applications across semiconductors, hydrogen and diagnostics. Cortical Labs, co- founded by a Malaysian entrepreneur, is building a Malaysian engineering presence around systems that combine living neurons with silicon. Syntiant’s expansion into Penang brings manufacturing and research and development capabilities into Malaysia, creating around 800 high-tech jobs and strengthening the country’s role in edge artificial intelligence and advanced semiconductor applications.The point is not that every company will become a giant. The point is that Malaysia must accumulate more technical nodes in the ecosystem: engineers, patents, supplier relationships, manufacturing know-how, research capability, capital-market pathways and companies with the ambition to compete globally.The Commitment to Patient CapitalThis model reflects a simple reality: meaningful capability-building takes time. Some investments require longer horizons, and the returns may not always appear first on a single corporate balance sheet. They may show up instead as deeper supplier networks, stronger technical capabilities, higher-value jobs, tax revenue and more competitive Malaysian firms. The greater risk is not in entering these complex spaces. The greater risk is avoiding them, leaving Malaysia with only the letters of its past while the next generation of global industries is written elsewhere.Owning More of Malaysia’s FutureFor many Malaysians, this challenge is not abstract. It is reflected in wages, job quality, skills, business ownership and whether the next generation can access industries with a future. GDP growth alone is not enough if it does not create better pathways for Malaysia and Malaysians to advance.We often speak about development in large numbers: billions of ringgit of investment, percentage points of GDP growth, export values, market share and productivity statistics. These numbers matter. They help us measure progress. But the real test is whether these numbers translate into stronger Malaysian firms,deeper local capabilities, higher-value jobs and greater ownership of the value created in our own economy.Behind every number is a life. Behind every industry is a worker trying to upgrade his skills, a young graduate deciding whether to remain in Malaysia, an entrepreneur trying to build something difficult, and a family hoping that the next generation will live with greater opportunity than the last.This is the deeper purpose of Dana Impak. It is not only to deploy capital, but to help Malaysia create the conditions where more of these individual stories can become stories of progress. It is capital deployed to help Malaysia build the firms, skills, technologies, intellectual property and ecosystems that allow us to participate more meaningfully in the industries that will define the future.This requires patience and discipline. Some returns will appear directly as financial gains. Others will appear as supplier depth, technical capability, tax revenue, better jobs, stronger firms and more competitive Malaysian companies. Not all of these returns will be captured immediately on a single balance sheet, but they matter because they strengthen the productive base of the country.No single institution can do this alone. Dana Impak can catalyse, but the work of building a more complex economy requires government, regulators, universities, institutional capital, private capital, entrepreneurs and firms to move with shared purpose. The middle-income trap was not created by one decision, and it will not be dismantled by one institution.The difficult things are difficult precisely because they require sustained effort before the payoff is obvious. But if Malaysia wants to move beyond hosting activity to owning more of the value created from that activity, these are the things we must do — patiently, collectively and with discipline.“At Dana Impak, impact is not a slogan. It is an investment discipline. We deploy catalytic capital where it can strengthen Malaysian firms, support potential champions and build ecosystems that are critical to Malaysia’s next stage of growth.”Kayse FooInterim Head of Dana Impak

 Malaysia's renewable energy ambitions are well-documented. The National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) targets 70% renewable energy capacity by 2050, with large-scale solar (LSS) initiatives as a central pillar.But the capital flowing into green infrastructure today is concentrated. High capital costs mean only large solar companies can build and manage these facilities. For the average investor, the only available route into green energy is through the listed shares of those same companies.This is a structural participation gap, not a policy shortcoming. Commercial power purchase agreements (PPA) for solar assets run as long as 20 years, carrying a steady projected internal rate of return over the PPA lifespan. The economics are sound. The access is not.Tokenisation is one structural response to this gap. Over the past decade, blockchain has progressed from an experimental technology into a foundation for real-world financial infrastructure. One of the more significant developments in that evolution is the tokenisation of real-world assets (RWAs): the process of representing physical assets as digital tokens on-chain. By fractionalising ownership of physical infrastructure, tokenisation lowers the minimum viable threshold for investor participation. Investors can hold tokens representing verified assets and receive on-chain yield flows that are distributed back to holders.An Early Builder in This SpaceGEN is a Malaysian startup attempting to build the trust layer this model requires. Founded by Ines Yong, who brings close to a decade of experience as a builder in the Web3 space, GEN's thesis is that Malaysia's solar market is a viable starting point for energy tokenisation at scale. "GEN specialises in energy," Yong says, "specifically, turning energy infrastructure into accessible, tokenised assets which will open up new opportunities for institutional or small scale investors, particularly those who want to diversify into clean energy."The company's product, GEN Core, is a proprietary end-to-end solution. In Yong's words: "The hardware captures verified energy data at source, a data layer that standardises performance, and a tokenisation engine. Real assets generate real data, and investors can capture real yield." The model's logic rests on what Yong calls a verified data layer, a trusted foundation for transparent, fractional and liquid investment. "Tokenisation unlocks access, but validation creates trust," she says.GEN is building on the Solana blockchain, selected for its speed and low transaction costs, which the team identifies as essential requirements for tokenised assets tied to physical infrastructure.The company is at pre-commercial stage. It has been shortlisted in SIDEC's Token-X programme, which provides mentor support, resources and incubation. It has also applied for Cradle's CIP SPARK grant, which covers development and pre-commercialisation of technology startups. It has also received backing from the Solana Foundation to further develop its products. These are third-party signals that the approach has merit worth developing. However, proving commercial viability is the next challenge for an ambitious startup like GEN.How a Trust Layer Supports Data IntegrityGEN's model rests on a specific claim: that the data integrity problem in RWA tokenisation can be solved through hardware-level capture and on-chain verification. Yong is direct about the differentiation: "Most builders only do tokenisation without real data, or energy management without investment tools. GEN does both, and we are building a trust layer on top of this. Blockchain technology ensures transparent on-chain data, stable returns, and open access."Whether that differentiation holds commercially depends on questions the market has not yet answered. Developing GEN Core requires striking agreements with large-scale power producers while simultaneously developing tokenised assets for investors. These are parallel tracks with different stakeholders, different timelines, and different risk profiles. Yong acknowledges that getting disparate ecosystem participants aligned has not been straightforward. "Getting government programmes and a blockchain protocol to sit at the same table was not easy. But we made it happen, and that's the only way to push real use cases forward."Malaysia's solar market provides the structural conditions that make this locally relevant. The market is mature, with established operators, existing infrastructure, and a policy environment that supports the sector. Global capital is already coming to Malaysia to build in this space, and the NETR provides a long-term demand anchor for green infrastructure development.What this means for the ecosystemEarly stage builders like GEN represent a starting point. They are tapping into new opportunities in energy infrastructure through frontier technologies such as tokenisation. Having participated in hackathons and investor pitches, Yong believes the ecosystem is listening.Builders in the blockchain space aim to scale from the start. Venture capital (VC) investors are cognisant of this, and more fims with investment theses focusing on blockchain and Web3 are starting to look closer into the ecosystem of developers based in Southeast Asia.Tokenisation in energy infrastructure unlocks new opportunities to connect operators and investors. The participation gap in green energy financing is a function of how the asset class has historically been structured, not a reflection of investor appetite. Tokenisation does not change the underlying assets. It changes who can access them, provided the trust architecture works.For that architecture to work, the data integrity layer needs to be independently verifiable. The yield distribution mechanism needs regulatory clarity. And the capital supporting companies at this stage needs to be structured around the timelines that pre-commercial infrastructure development actually requires.GEN is one early attempt to build that architecture in Malaysia. The ecosystem programmes backing it reflect a recognition that the approach is worth developing. Whether tokenisation closes the participation gap in green energy financing depends on whether the trust layer being built now holds at scale. Jelawang Capital supports the development of fund managers with the capability to evaluate and back frontier categories as they mature in Malaysia's venture ecosystem.